When making their own choices in the STEM vs. … A psychologist is more likely to know how to motivate people and to understand what users want than is an engineer who has worked only in the technology trenches.” “An engineering degree is very valuable,” Wadhwa writes, “but the sense of empathy that comes from music, arts, literature, and psychology provides a big advantage in design. Jack Ma, the chief of Alibaba in China, holds a bachelor’s degree in English.Airbnb founder Brian Chesky majored in the fine arts.Slack founder Stewart Butterfield majored in English.Logitech chief executive Bracken Darrell majored in English. YouTube chief executive Susan Wojcicki majored in history and literature.In a recent article for The Washington Post, noted engineering professor Vivek Wadhwa pointed out that some of today’s most renowned innovators hold degrees in STEAM education disciplines: For example, China has increased its investments in research and development (R&D) by an average of 18 percent since 2000, compared with the United States’ growth of only 4 percent over the same timeframe.Ĭonsidering all of that, is a STEM-focused approach really the only pathway to personal and professional success? There are plenty of real-world examples that demonstrate why a STEAM education can provide a student with a more well-rounded knowledge base. According to the latest report from the NSF’s National Science Board, while the United States is indeed the global leader in science and technology, that lead is shrinking as other countries-most notably China-continue to make strides. The focus on STEM has also provided the United States with a tenuous advantage in science and technology. According to the Pew Research Center, women may be underrepresented in some STEM careers but are excelling in others and either “matching or exceeding their share in the overall US workforce.” Specifically, women make up three-quarters of health-care practitioners and technicians. Some reports suggest that women in particular have reaped the benefits of a STEM education. STEM-only proponents argue that a STEM-educated workforce is vital to the generation of new ideas, flexibility, and critical thinking. The specific STEM disciplines, according to the NSF, are engineering, math, biology, psychology, economics, agricultural sciences, and other behavioral sciences. Since then, schools and universities throughout the United States and other countries-including China, Australia, the United Kingdom, France, and Taiwan-have adopted STEM-focused curricula. Ramaley wrote to a colleague that it was “impossible to make wise personal decisions, exercise good citizenship, or compete in an increasingly global economy without knowledge of science and the ability to apply thoughtfully and appropriately.” While developing curricula for the National Science Foundation (NSF) in 2001, Dr. Judith Ramaley is credited with launching the STEM-centered approach to education. In this article, we’ll delve deeper into the debate of STEM vs. There has been a widely held view that an education grounded in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) leads to professional and personal success however, the added emphasis of the study of arts to that equation is gaining momentum-stretching the acronym to STEAM.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |